auto magazines

An Avoidable Crash in Car Loans – The Fresh York Times

An Avoidable Crash in Car Loans

Congressional Republicans never dreamed the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and have been attempting to weaken the agency ever since it was created under the Dodd-Frank financial reform law of 2010. They’re likely to intensify their efforts next year with Donald Trump in the White House.

If successful, they will enfeeble an agency that has proved its worth time and again. In the past five years, the bureau has coerced lenders to provide $11.7 billion in restitution and ease to twenty seven million consumers for illegal practices involving mortgages, foreclosures, credit cards, student loans, payday loans and other forms of credit.

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter

Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, the Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.

Thank you for subscribing.

An error has occurred. Please attempt again later.

You are already subscribed to this email.

• See Sample
• Manage Email Preferences
• Not you?
• Privacy Policy
• Opt out or contact us anytime

In fact, more federal regulation of consumer financial services is needed, not less. A case in point is subprime car loans marketed to people with low credit scores. The Federal Reserve Bank of Fresh York recently voiced “significant concern” over rising delinquencies in such loans; harshly six million borrowers are on the brink of losing their cars. That delinquencies are enhancing even as the jobless rate declines suggests that lenders are loosening their standards in order to “qualify” borrowers for more debt than they can afford. In the world of subprime auto loans, which are usually made by nonbank finance companies, interest rates can reach up to thirty percent — an annual rate so high that a lender can turn a profit even when many borrowers default. In addition, lenders, rather than holding on to the loans, which could expose them to losses, often package them into securities and sell them to investors greedy for the high yields they suggest. The parallels to subprime mortgage lending are inexact; the mortgage market, for example, dwarfs auto lending. But the similarities, including lending on liberate terms to unsophisticated buyers, warrant serious concern.

What can the consumer bureau do? The reaction is, not much, and that is a big reason subprime auto lending is so troubling. Congress gave the bureau authority over banks and nonbank finance companies. But it did not give the agency authority over auto dealers. Auto dealers, who tend to be prominent constituents in most congressional districts, lobbied successfully to be exempted from regulation by the bureau. That special treatment has meant relatively powerless oversight of auto lending, because many auto loans, however financed by regulated lenders, are arranged by dealers, who often have discretion over most loan terms.

A bust in subprime auto lending, when it happens, won’t shatter the economy as the mortgage bust did. But it will harm millions of Americans. More and better financial oversight could help to avoid this outcome, but Congress is intent on moving in the opposite direction.

Go after The Fresh York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTOpinion), and sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter.

A version of this editorial shows up in print on December 21, 2016, on Page A26 of the Fresh York edition with the headline: The Avoidable Crash in Car Loans. Today’s Paper | Subscribe

We’re interested in your feedback on this page. Tell us what you think.

An Avoidable Crash in Car Loans – The Fresh York Times

An Avoidable Crash in Car Loans

Congressional Republicans never dreamed the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and have been attempting to weaken the agency ever since it was created under the Dodd-Frank financial reform law of 2010. They’re likely to intensify their efforts next year with Donald Trump in the White House.

If successful, they will enfeeble an agency that has proved its worth time and again. In the past five years, the bureau has compelled lenders to provide $11.7 billion in restitution and ease to twenty seven million consumers for illegal practices involving mortgages, foreclosures, credit cards, student loans, payday loans and other forms of credit.

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter

Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, the Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.

Thank you for subscribing.

An error has occurred. Please attempt again later.

You are already subscribed to this email.

• See Sample
• Manage Email Preferences
• Not you?
• Privacy Policy
• Opt out or contact us anytime

In fact, more federal regulation of consumer financial services is needed, not less. A case in point is subprime car loans marketed to people with low credit scores. The Federal Reserve Bank of Fresh York recently voiced “significant concern” over rising delinquencies in such loans; toughly six million borrowers are on the edge of losing their cars. That delinquencies are enlargening even as the jobless rate declines suggests that lenders are loosening their standards in order to “qualify” borrowers for more debt than they can afford. In the world of subprime auto loans, which are usually made by nonbank finance companies, interest rates can reach up to thirty percent — an annual rate so high that a lender can turn a profit even when many borrowers default. In addition, lenders, rather than holding on to the loans, which could expose them to losses, often package them into securities and sell them to investors greedy for the high yields they suggest. The parallels to subprime mortgage lending are inexact; the mortgage market, for example, dwarfs auto lending. But the similarities, including lending on liberate terms to unsophisticated buyers, warrant serious concern.

What can the consumer bureau do? The reaction is, not much, and that is a big reason subprime auto lending is so troubling. Congress gave the bureau authority over banks and nonbank finance companies. But it did not give the agency authority over auto dealers. Auto dealers, who tend to be prominent constituents in most congressional districts, lobbied successfully to be exempted from regulation by the bureau. That special treatment has meant relatively feeble oversight of auto lending, because many auto loans, tho’ financed by regulated lenders, are arranged by dealers, who often have discretion over most loan terms.

A bust in subprime auto lending, when it happens, won’t shatter the economy as the mortgage bust did. But it will harm millions of Americans. More and better financial oversight could help to avoid this outcome, but Congress is intent on moving in the opposite direction.

Go after The Fresh York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTOpinion), and sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter.

A version of this editorial shows up in print on December 21, 2016, on Page A26 of the Fresh York edition with the headline: The Avoidable Crash in Car Loans. Today’s Paper | Subscribe

We’re interested in your feedback on this page. Tell us what you think.

Related movie:

---